SPM 405 Organization Administration in Sports Signature Assignment
SPM 405 Organization Administration in Sports Signature Assignment
DO YOU NEED SOME HELP COMPLETING THIS ASSIGNMENT? ORDER NOW!
Performance Leadership and Management in Elite Sport: A Black and White Issue or Different
Shades of Grey? (100 points)
Students will read and answer the following questions below regarding the case study on
Performance Leadership and Management.
Instructions for SPM 405 Sport Management Research Paper
1. Read the entire case study
2. Submit 500–700-word summary of the case study. (No more than 3 pages- Does
not included cover page and references).
3. APA format Only & Cite the case study and all other supporting materials used in
your review.
Questions for the case study:
• What stood out to you in the case study?
• What does Performance Leadership mean to you and was this a good framework to use
for this case study?
• What method was used in the case study?
• Who are the participants?
• What tool was used? (I.e- interviews, focus groups, surveys, etc.) Explain why this
method was the best way to gather information for the study being conducted.
• What future research would you recommend for this case study?
You MUST use APA 7th edition writing style. The guide link is at the end of the
instructions. Please use the guidelines for cover page, citing authors, and references. All
papers must be double spaced using 11or 12 font Calibri or New Times Roman
APA Formatting Guide
https://library.stritch.edu/getmedia/4186d592-6fb8-4a45-be26-6ebaec6c975d/APAStyleGuide7
Criteria Unacceptable Needs
Improvement
Meets
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Analysis and
Comprehension
of the case study
for performance
leadership.
Shows little or no
understanding of
the case analysis
for performance
leadership.
Shows some
knowledge and
understanding of
the case study
and performance
leadership.
Shows adequate
knowledge and
understanding of
the case study
and performance
leadership.
Shows superior
knowledge and
understanding of
the case study
and performance
leadership.
Identifying the
methods used
within the case
study/research.
The description of
identifying the
methods used
within the case
study/research.
Shows some
understanding of
identifying the
methods used
within the case
study/research.
Shows adequate
knowledge of
identifying the
methods used
within the case
study/research.
Shows superior
knowledge of
identifying the
methods used
within the case
study/research.
Identifying who
the participants
are within the
study and their
perspective.
Shows little or no
understanding of
Identifying who
the participants
are within the
study and their
perspective.
Shows some
understanding of
Identifying who
the participants
are within the
study and their
perspective.
Shows adequate
knowledge of
Identifying who
the participants
are within the
study and their
perspective.
Shows superior
knowledge of
Identifying who
the participants
are within the
study and their
perspective.
Identify the tools
used to conduct
the research
study (surveys,
interviews, etc.)
Shows little or no
understanding of
Identifying the
tools used to
conduct the
research study
(surveys,
interviews, etc.)
Shows some
understanding of
Identifying the
tools used to
conduct the
research study
(surveys,
interviews, etc.)
Shows adequate
knowledge of
Identifying the
tools used to
conduct the
research study
(surveys,
interviews, etc.)
Shows superior
knowledge of
Identifying the
tools used to
conduct the
research study
(surveys,
interviews, etc.)
Text – Font Choice
& Formatting
Font formatting
makes it very
difficult to read
the material.
Font formatting
has been carefully
planned to
complement the
content. It may be
a little hard to
read.
Font formats have
been carefully
planned to
enhance
readability
Font formats (e.g.,
color, bold, italic)
have been
carefully planned
to enhance
readability and
content.
Grammar Unacceptable
number (amt) of
grammatical
errors
Noticeable
amount of
grammatical and
spelling errors
Minimal
grammatical and
spelling errors
No grammatical
and spelling
errors
Grading Scale:
96-100 points = A (Exceeds Expectations)
86-95 points = B (Meets Expectations)
76-85 points = C (Needs Improvement)
66-75 point = D (Unacceptable)
65 points or below = F (Failure)